| D2 | Product purchase invoices | Provided |
| D4 | Warranty template | Provided |
| D5 | Method statement | NOT PROVIDED |
| D7 | Installation photographs (12) | Provided |
Further schedule rows redacted.
The product named on the purchase invoices (D2) corresponds to a certificated product with published installation requirements. Certificate current at review date. Result: PASS — published requirements exist against which this file can be assessed.
Where a product has no published specification, this checkpoint alone changes everything that follows.
Finding 01 — Method statement (Documentary)
The warranty template provided (D4) warrants thermal performance “when installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines.” No method statement or installation procedure was provided, and none of the documents supplied records the installation method actually used. The performance warranted in D4 is therefore conditional on a method this file does not evidence. Requirement reference: (installation guide, section ). Classification: Documentary gap — evidence absent.
- Finding 02 — Installed air gap:
- Finding 03 — Joint sealing and taping:
- Finding 04 — Coverage at gable:
- Finding 05 — :
- Finding 06 — :
Further findings redacted in this sample.
The file as provided would not, in its current state, evidence installation in accordance with the manufacturer’s published requirements. The gaps identified in Findings 01, 03, 04 and 06 are documentary and capable of remedy. Finding 02 requires physical verification. Recommended sequence: close the documentary gaps identified; then verify by site review if the Limited-Scope Technical Alignment Statement is required. The £750 fee is credited in full against that review.
The full report runs to sections. Its structure and sequence are part of the methodology and are not published.
This is a desktop documentary review: it can identify absence, inconsistency and photographic indications of deviation; it cannot verify physical installation. It is not a warranty, a guarantee, an accreditation, or a determination of legal compliance, and it contains no legal advice. Point-in-time, against the manufacturer’s published requirements as at the review date.